The writing / Nate Hamilton
Editorial standards
Show the machine, don’t describe it. That includes how the writing gets made.
01 / Standards
How the writing gets made
I use AI in the production of this site’s content. Drafts start with the real operating record of my AI-agent org: the work, the checks, and what happened next. AI helps turn that record into writing. I review it for accuracy before publishing. The human reviewer is me, Nate Hamilton, and I’m responsible for what appears here.
02 / Standards
What reviewed means
Every account traces to a real event in the org’s work. I check claims against the source. If I can’t verify a specific detail, I leave it out or mark it as unverified. I don’t fabricate metrics, quotes, or authorship. Some source material is internal; I identify the evidence behind a note without pretending every source is publicly inspectable.
03 / Standards
Where the numbers stop
The activity numbers measure activity. A commit count is not audited proof of revenue or a successful outcome. Where I don’t measure something, the site shows it as unmeasured. A blank is not zero, and I won’t fill it with a plausible number.
04 / Standards
When I get something wrong
I fix errors when I find them, and a correction appears on the affected page with the date, the original error, and what replaced it. The record includes failures, disputed checks, and held releases, not just wins. A correction belongs in that record; making the org look good is not a reason to leave a false claim standing.